Add a Comment

Comment by Stephen Hendren on May 1, 2013 at 19:51

http://www.linkedin.com/profile/edit?trk=hb_tab_pro_top

Feel free to add me on LinkedIn

Comment by David Graham on April 19, 2013 at 13:57

Afternoon, profile link below for anyone who want to connect.

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/david-graham/2a/a63/8b

Comment by Deborah Wroe on October 23, 2012 at 15:50

Are you all in the Owl Business News LinkedIn group which is mainly managers & owners of Oldham businesses http://linkd.in/ICcbsU

Comment by Deborah Wroe on May 9, 2012 at 10:39

We have 134 members in our Owl Business News LinkedIn group - mainly manager & owners of Oldham businesses http://linkd.in/ICcbsU Fancy joining us?

Comment by Deborah Wroe on April 13, 2012 at 10:52

Great discussion on 'The future face of Oldham' in our LinkedIn group http://linkd.in/kqrOf9 sign up, join in

Comment by Liz Lancashire on January 6, 2012 at 11:13

Here's the MEN's take on the case and for using LinkedIn, or 'Facebook with a tie', for job hunting http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/news/s/1469845_linkedin...

Comment by Kieron Hill on January 6, 2012 at 9:32

Quite right, being an employment law geek I hope it becomes a published judgement so we can see what the court actually says about it. The thing is you can't set a precedent in an employment tribunal its not a high enough court, but it would be interesting to see how they come to a decision. 

Comment by Liz Lancashire on January 6, 2012 at 9:23

Well this is true Kieron, it was a good headline that got us all talking! I'm interested to see if this case sets a precedent for the future, allowing companies to effectively censor employees personal/career information.

Comment by Kieron Hill on January 5, 2012 at 22:48

Thanks for the semi guru status Michael!

Interesting debate, my only thought I have is that there is likely to be much more to this than just the linkedin post, as if the relationship was good in he first place the post would not have resulted in such a harsh response and indeed may not have been made in the first place, The trouble with cases like this is that they tend to reduce a case to one factor when the problem is actually about the fundamental relationship between the employer and employee. Notifying employees of policies and procedures and checking CV etc are eminently good ideas but probably woudln't have made any difference because the relationship was already damaged beyond repair. Mind you it makes for a good headline even if the story has been dumbed down out of all recognition!

Comment by Liz Lancashire on January 5, 2012 at 17:08

He gave away too much information about the company, that's a given. But the point is, he is being vilified for posting his CV on the site, which others, including the manager of the process have also done. It appears that this 'new policy' at the company is not being communicated fully and across the board.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• …
• 5
• Next ›
• Page